rjgleason
January 31st, 2005, 09:50 PM
Nice story Freddy....Good sequence of shots. Do I see Juan Valdez and his mule in one of the shots? A good example of making your pics tell what you want the viewer to comprehend with any second guessing.
wallpaper 2011 Extensions Jessica londe
ramaonline
12-27 05:13 PM
TR - RIR has been documented in the DOL FAQ
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/backlog_faqs_12-22-06.pdf
Public Disclosure System
http://pds.pbls.doleta.gov
If you do not have the case number for the pending RIR LC you can contact your local senator for help in getting the current status on the case.
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/backlog_faqs_12-22-06.pdf
Public Disclosure System
http://pds.pbls.doleta.gov
If you do not have the case number for the pending RIR LC you can contact your local senator for help in getting the current status on the case.
senk1s
09-12 09:07 PM
I was trying to change H4 to F1 - while labor was pending
"Dont do it unless it is extremely important"
"Dont do it unless it is extremely important"
2011 Her curly, dirty londe hair
seeking_GC
05-15 08:01 PM
This is great news- has it already been introduced in the house? What are the next steps?
more...
kiwi
10-27 03:48 PM
My Labor PD is Jan 2003, was approved on Sept 25th. Got it last week. It is very random process I guess. Can't tell how long you have to wait knowing so many people behind us got their approvals before us. Any inquiry didn't work. I just gave up and waited.
roseball
03-08 01:00 PM
Since your Father in law is a Central Govt Employee, i believe the reason they issued a white 221g is because he may not have provided a NOC (No objection Certificate) from the govt which should state that he is just travelling to US for tourism purposes and not for job related travel. This was how i had to get my father in law to get a NOC inorder to get his stamping done. Once they saw the NOC, they granted the visa.
My 2 cents.
He had the NOC with him and he did mention it to the Visa Officer about the NOC and she mentioned its not required and asked him to email his CV to the email address listed in the white slip for further processing.
My 2 cents.
He had the NOC with him and he did mention it to the Visa Officer about the NOC and she mentioned its not required and asked him to email his CV to the email address listed in the white slip for further processing.
more...
justin150377
06-28 08:55 PM
My lawywer mentioned that they could file Monday July 2nd for packet delivery on Tuesday July 3rd. What is the definitnion of the filing date? Is it done electronically so that the filing date is Monday (the date the packet is sent) and delivery date is Tuesday? Or is the delivered date the filing date.
2010 Tuesday May 31, 2011 16:07
arundhati_datta
03-24 06:13 PM
EB 3 India..PD 03/24/2006. EAD approved-10/28/07; AP-01/09 , also same for the derivatives too..I-140 approved 09/13/2007, Also FP done..in OCT.
any update when can we get GC.
any update when can we get GC.
more...
Karthikthiru
03-18 11:57 AM
I also had two LUD's after I submitted the AR-11 form. It took two days more after I submitted the AR-11 form
Karthik
Karthik
hair miley cyrus hair colour 2011.
sammyb
02-16 11:57 AM
DS 157 is required based on age of the applicant ... your dad may not need but your mom need it ... pls check the vfs site for age range for DS 157 ...
hope this helps
HI,
I recently booked an appointment for visiting visa for my parents through vfs, during the process , I first entered my Dad's details and then his ds 156, then It asked if I wanted to add additional family members, then I entered my Mom's details and her ds 156 . After that it asked for my Mom's ds 157 and never showed my Dad's ds 157.
So the final list of documents it generated was :
Dad's ds 156, Mom's ds 156,157 , interview letter.
Is this correct, does my dad need ds 157 and interview letter or is 1 ds 157 and interview letter enough ?
Thank you for your time.
hope this helps
HI,
I recently booked an appointment for visiting visa for my parents through vfs, during the process , I first entered my Dad's details and then his ds 156, then It asked if I wanted to add additional family members, then I entered my Mom's details and her ds 156 . After that it asked for my Mom's ds 157 and never showed my Dad's ds 157.
So the final list of documents it generated was :
Dad's ds 156, Mom's ds 156,157 , interview letter.
Is this correct, does my dad need ds 157 and interview letter or is 1 ds 157 and interview letter enough ?
Thank you for your time.
more...
ttguy
08-11 02:40 AM
You dont have to mention **it. Just saying diaper is enough, everyone knows whats in diaper.
hot She wore her long, londe hair
kcindian
09-19 09:10 AM
Thanks for the response div. I did think it was too good to be true. It is.
more...
house miley cyrus hair 2011. hair
stefanusc
03-13 01:21 PM
Hi to all,
I met with a potential client who is an illegal immigrant living in the US. She has a child who is a US citizen. The father was voluntarily deported and the mother gave him permission to take the child back to their home country to visit the grandparents. The father was supposed to make sure the child returned to the US within 3 months. It has been 6 months. If my client files an application under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, will the US Government begin deportation proceedings?
I met with a potential client who is an illegal immigrant living in the US. She has a child who is a US citizen. The father was voluntarily deported and the mother gave him permission to take the child back to their home country to visit the grandparents. The father was supposed to make sure the child returned to the US within 3 months. It has been 6 months. If my client files an application under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, will the US Government begin deportation proceedings?
tattoo Miley Cyrus Hairstyles 2011
noida123
07-29 07:33 PM
Sona 75, Sent u a PM
more...
pictures miley cyrus 2011 pictures.
cygent
06-18 08:03 PM
Dear Attorney,
I request your help with the following.
I am working for Client A on EAD through Vendor B & Company C (my W2 holder) in California. I now want to join Vendor B & work for Client A. What are the ramifications based on below?
This is my agreement with C :-
During the term of the assignment & for a period of 1 Year following the termination of the business/employment relationship between C & cygent, cygent will not do any of the following:
1. Directly or indirectly call on, solicit, or take away (directly or through another entity) any of C's customers or potential customers cygent became aware of as a result of performing services for the above referenced assignment; or
2. Directly or indirectly offer or attempt to offer (directly or through another entity) services that were offered via C for the same projects that were performed under the agreements between C & cygent, or
3. solicit or hire away any of C's employees or contractors C became aware of as a result of performing services under agreements between cygent & C.
cygent will be held responsible for any losses suffered by C due to violation of the terms stated in this agreement. jurisdiction is County of Alameda, California.
Thank you & Regards,
CYGENT
I request your help with the following.
I am working for Client A on EAD through Vendor B & Company C (my W2 holder) in California. I now want to join Vendor B & work for Client A. What are the ramifications based on below?
This is my agreement with C :-
During the term of the assignment & for a period of 1 Year following the termination of the business/employment relationship between C & cygent, cygent will not do any of the following:
1. Directly or indirectly call on, solicit, or take away (directly or through another entity) any of C's customers or potential customers cygent became aware of as a result of performing services for the above referenced assignment; or
2. Directly or indirectly offer or attempt to offer (directly or through another entity) services that were offered via C for the same projects that were performed under the agreements between C & cygent, or
3. solicit or hire away any of C's employees or contractors C became aware of as a result of performing services under agreements between cygent & C.
cygent will be held responsible for any losses suffered by C due to violation of the terms stated in this agreement. jurisdiction is County of Alameda, California.
Thank you & Regards,
CYGENT
dresses hair miley cyrus 2011 fat.
gckidhamal
02-28 06:59 PM
Hi guys,
My PD is current and my I-140 approved. I received below RFE on my pending I-485 related to my name listed differently on documents.
RFE words are listed below.
NAME DIFFERENCE:
Submit documentary evidence to establish that Pravin Bhalla, Pravinkumar Bhalla and Praveenkumar Bhalla are the same person. The most persuasive evidence is photo identification in each name. If the last name is different due to marriage, submit the marriage certificate. Note: Affidavits will not be considered primary evidence.
I don't have a lawyer for my I-485. Any help on how to answer this REF will be great help.
Thank you in advance for your response.
My PD is current and my I-140 approved. I received below RFE on my pending I-485 related to my name listed differently on documents.
RFE words are listed below.
NAME DIFFERENCE:
Submit documentary evidence to establish that Pravin Bhalla, Pravinkumar Bhalla and Praveenkumar Bhalla are the same person. The most persuasive evidence is photo identification in each name. If the last name is different due to marriage, submit the marriage certificate. Note: Affidavits will not be considered primary evidence.
I don't have a lawyer for my I-485. Any help on how to answer this REF will be great help.
Thank you in advance for your response.
more...
makeup coloring. miley cyrus hair
beautifulMind
10-29 11:44 AM
Are you pinching beautiful_mind reminding him about the reds. I think he isn't concerned but you appear to be more concerned for his reds.
It would be nice to get a green dot :)
Not that it matters that much
It would be nice to get a green dot :)
Not that it matters that much
girlfriend We love her with londe hair
zwswim
01-26 12:55 PM
I am in H1b and my wife is a F1 student. Both of us are chinese.
My company will apply the Green Card for me this year. As I know, my wife can be dependent on my application.
My wife always go back to china every summary or winter vocation. She need to re-apply her F1 visa every year as a student from china.
My concern stems from my wife's F1 status. We are wondering whether the immigrant petition will conflict with her F1's non-immigrant intention (unlike H1B which is accepted as a transient from non-immigrant to immigrant).
Will this conflict have a huge affection on her F1 visa application in china?
My company will apply the Green Card for me this year. As I know, my wife can be dependent on my application.
My wife always go back to china every summary or winter vocation. She need to re-apply her F1 visa every year as a student from china.
My concern stems from my wife's F1 status. We are wondering whether the immigrant petition will conflict with her F1's non-immigrant intention (unlike H1B which is accepted as a transient from non-immigrant to immigrant).
Will this conflict have a huge affection on her F1 visa application in china?
hairstyles miley cyrus hair color 2010.
LegalIndianInUSA
09-10 11:01 PM
Apologies if this is covered in a thread elsewhere (doubt it)
A colleague and I both filed EB2 PERM labors at around the same time in 2005.
Our 140s got approved roughly together too/
We both also applied for 485 on July 2nd, through the same lawyer, and both applications went to TSC.
Both of us saw our checks get encashed on the same date.
Here's where our applications diverged.
He received an LUD last friday and his EAD card has been ordered.
I received an FP request today(monday) but no LUD updates.
Although our applications are a bit dis-similar (he is married, i filed single), I have this theory that USCIS is splitting their queue, so as to not bombard its internal departments with the flood of work that has recently come in.
It makes total sense to split people into two groups (atleast), and for each:
a) send them EAD cards with a note of FP pending.
b) send them FP notices and do their EAD later.
(I know another friend who is in group a, while I'm in b)
Yes, we all like to bitch and moan about USCIS, but thats generally emo-talk.
So, has anyone else noticed this, or can anyone help me understand what I'm missing here.
This is just me speculating, but I'd like to throw this thought out there and have it rebound with your inputs.
:)
A colleague and I both filed EB2 PERM labors at around the same time in 2005.
Our 140s got approved roughly together too/
We both also applied for 485 on July 2nd, through the same lawyer, and both applications went to TSC.
Both of us saw our checks get encashed on the same date.
Here's where our applications diverged.
He received an LUD last friday and his EAD card has been ordered.
I received an FP request today(monday) but no LUD updates.
Although our applications are a bit dis-similar (he is married, i filed single), I have this theory that USCIS is splitting their queue, so as to not bombard its internal departments with the flood of work that has recently come in.
It makes total sense to split people into two groups (atleast), and for each:
a) send them EAD cards with a note of FP pending.
b) send them FP notices and do their EAD later.
(I know another friend who is in group a, while I'm in b)
Yes, we all like to bitch and moan about USCIS, but thats generally emo-talk.
So, has anyone else noticed this, or can anyone help me understand what I'm missing here.
This is just me speculating, but I'd like to throw this thought out there and have it rebound with your inputs.
:)
gondalguru
07-19 11:07 PM
Just curious.
Who played what role in the reversal of USCIS/DOS decision?
Did IV core / AILA / Congresswoman Lofgren worked together in the back ground? Flower campaign / SJ rally / media - newspaper articles ?
May be all of the above had its unique impact on USCIS's decision to accept I-485?
Who played what role in the reversal of USCIS/DOS decision?
Did IV core / AILA / Congresswoman Lofgren worked together in the back ground? Flower campaign / SJ rally / media - newspaper articles ?
May be all of the above had its unique impact on USCIS's decision to accept I-485?
fromnaija
04-29 05:13 PM
"Oversight" is correct as Visa Office was responding to House Committee that has oversight function for immigration.
I'm guessing you meant "insight" (understanding, revelation) not "oversight" (supervision, mistake)
I'm guessing you meant "insight" (understanding, revelation) not "oversight" (supervision, mistake)
No comments:
Post a Comment